This case had several layers to it, and it’s worth being honest about that.
First, the visa. Lenders treat visa applications differently depending on the type of visa, how long the applicant has been in the UK, and how much time remains before it expires or leads to full residency. A Tier Two visa held for four and a half years is a very different proposition to someone who landed six months ago. Time in country builds confidence for lenders – it shows stability, credit history, and financial behaviour over an extended period.
Second, the deposit size. At 5%, this is the minimum threshold and it narrows the field significantly. Where a 10% deposit might open the door to five or six lenders, a 5% deposit may mean only one lender will consider the application. That lender has to be the right one.
Third, the source of funds. The deposit was coming from India, which meant additional due diligence was required. Lenders take the origin of funds seriously – depending on the country, there are additional verification checks to satisfy anti-money laundering requirements. This isn’t a reflection on the client. It is simply the process, and it has to be done properly.
Any one of these factors can complicate a mortgage application. All three together meant that standard routes simply were not going to work.